IDSINTELLIGENTDATA SOLUTIONSContact us
HomeSolutionsAI Governance

AI you can account for, before someone asks you to.

Most organisations are running more AI than their policy covers. We build the governance layer on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework: an inventory of what is actually deployed, a risk tier for each system, controls proportionate to that tier, and evidence you can hand to a regulator, a customer's security team or your own board.

NIST AI RMFThe framework the program is built on
4Core functions: govern, map, measure, manage
ISO 42001Certification path where it is warranted
InventoryFirst deliverable, every engagement
The practice

How the practice is structured

Four moves, in order. Most programs we inherit are strong at one stage and thin at the others. The assessment tells you which.

01 / Govern

Set the policy, the roles and the accountability before the next model ships.

  • AI Policy & Standards
  • Acceptable Use Policy
  • Roles & Accountability Model
  • AI Governance Committee Design
  • Procurement & Third-Party Standards
02 / Map

Establish what AI is actually running, in what context, at what risk.

  • AI System Inventory
  • Use Case Intake & Triage
  • Risk Tiering & Classification
  • Context & Impact Assessment
  • Data Provenance Review
03 / Measure

Test each system against the claims being made for it.

  • Model Evaluation & Testing
  • Bias & Fairness Assessment
  • Explainability Review
  • Red-Teaming & Adversarial Testing
  • Human Oversight Assessment
04 / Manage

Treat the risk, monitor it, and retire the system when it is done.

  • Risk Treatment & Control Selection
  • Deployment Gates & Sign-Off
  • Continuous Monitoring
  • AI Incident Response
  • Audit Evidence & Reporting
The catalogue

29 services in AI Governance

Everything on the solution map under this domain. If a requirement isn't listed, it's usually still sourceable, so ask.

Govern 6

  • AI Policy & Standards
  • Acceptable Use Policy
  • Roles & Accountability Model
  • AI Governance Committee Design
  • Procurement & Third-Party Standards
  • AI Incident Response Policy

Map 6

  • AI System Inventory
  • Use Case Intake & Triage
  • Risk Tiering & Classification
  • Context & Impact Assessment
  • Data Provenance Review
  • Third-Party Model Mapping

Measure 6

  • Model Evaluation & Testing
  • Bias & Fairness Assessment
  • Explainability Review
  • Performance & Drift Monitoring
  • Red-Teaming & Adversarial Testing
  • Human Oversight Assessment

Manage 6

  • Risk Treatment & Control Selection
  • Deployment Gates & Sign-Off
  • Continuous Monitoring
  • AI Incident Response
  • Model Retirement & Decommissioning
  • Audit Evidence & Reporting

Assurance & Standards 5

  • NIST AI RMF Readiness Assessment
  • ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Analysis
  • EU AI Act Readiness
  • Generative AI Profile (NIST AI 600-1)
  • AI Vendor Due Diligence
What changes

What you actually get out of it

Not a platform choice. A set of decisions with the reasoning attached, and someone accountable for them at renewal.

  • A single inventory of AI systems, including the ones procured inside a SaaS renewal.
  • A risk tier per system, so controls are proportionate rather than uniform.
  • A named owner for every deployed system, and a documented sign-off gate.
  • Evidence organised the way an auditor, a regulator or a customer will ask for it.
AI governance baseline4–6 weeks
01Discovery: AI systems in use, sanctioned and notMap
02Risk tiering against use and impactMap
03Policy and accountability gap analysisGovern
04Control selection proportionate to tierManage
05Evaluation and monitoring plan per tierMeasure
06Governance roadmap and evidence packDeliverable
Inventory firstRequest scoping
Next step

This practice begins with an assessment.

Scope, duration and deliverables are agreed in writing before it starts. Ask for the scope document and we will send it.