Set the policy, the roles and the accountability before the next model ships.
- AI Policy & Standards
- Acceptable Use Policy
- Roles & Accountability Model
- AI Governance Committee Design
- Procurement & Third-Party Standards
Most organisations are running more AI than their policy covers. We build the governance layer on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework: an inventory of what is actually deployed, a risk tier for each system, controls proportionate to that tier, and evidence you can hand to a regulator, a customer's security team or your own board.
Four moves, in order. Most programs we inherit are strong at one stage and thin at the others. The assessment tells you which.
Everything on the solution map under this domain. If a requirement isn't listed, it's usually still sourceable, so ask.
Not a platform choice. A set of decisions with the reasoning attached, and someone accountable for them at renewal.
A finding in one practice commonly implicates another. These are the three most often opened alongside this work.
Privacy programs built to run, not just to pass an audit: what personal data you hold, where it goes, and the workflow that answers a rights request on time.
ExploreLayered defense on the NIST framework: identify, protect, detect, respond, with compliance evidence you can hand to an auditor.
ExploreWhere the workload should live, how it gets there, and who runs it at 2am, across public, private, hybrid and colocation.
ExploreScope, duration and deliverables are agreed in writing before it starts. Ask for the scope document and we will send it.